Labor dispatch and labor outsourcing are two common flexible employment methods, but their legal nature and responsibility allocation differ significantly. Enterprises must select based on actual needs and operate compliantly.
Labor dispatch: tripartite relationship (dispatch unit - receiving unit - dispatched worker). The dispatch unit signs labor contracts with workers, while the receiving unit actually uses and directly manages workers. Labor outsourcing: bipartite relationship (outsourcer - contractor). The contractor recruits and manages its own employees; the outsourcer focuses only on work deliverables and does not directly manage contractor employees. The core difference is "managing people" vs. "managing work."
Labor dispatch: the receiving unit bears obligations including equal pay for equal work, overtime pay, work injury responsibility (receiving unit bears work injury insurance liability, may seek recourse from dispatch unit), position restrictions (three-nature positions), and ratio limits (not exceeding 10%). The dispatch unit bears employer responsibilities (contract signing, social security payment, wage payment). Labor outsourcing: the contractor bears all employer responsibilities; the outsourcer generally bears no employment liability, but bears corresponding liability if at fault in contractor selection or instruction.
Labor dispatch cost: dispatch unit management fee (~5%β15% of wages) + social security/housing fund + wages. Risks: deemed de facto labor relationship, equal pay disputes, joint work injury liability. Labor outsourcing cost: contractor service fee (including labor, management, profit). Risks: "fake outsourcing, real dispatch" determination (if outsourcer directly manages employees, treated as labor dispatch), contractor lacking qualifications leading to invalid contract.
Selection recommendations: use labor dispatch when direct employee management is needed and positions are temporary/auxiliary/substitutable (select qualified dispatch units, control ratio); use labor outsourcing when deliverables can be outcome-based and direct management is unnecessary (select qualified and capable contractors, contracts clearly specify outcome-based settlement). Avoid "fake outsourcing, real dispatch": outsourcing contracts must not stipulate direct management rights over employees, must not settle by headcount, and must not directly direct employee work.